On Negative Book Reviews: Part I

This post is the first in a two-part series.  All opinions are my own, and I am not speaking for the rest of the reviewers at The Readers Cafe, as we each (like everyone else) have our own individual approaches to choosing reading material.

Readers, I’m afraid I’ve been thinking.  (A dangerous pastime, I know. )  I was struck, in Veronica’s latest review, by her stated dislike of writing “bad” book reviews.  I understand why she feels the way she does (without putting words in her mouth, of course–this is my interpretation only); not everyone shares our individual tastes, and writing a negative review might turn someone away from a book that they might have otherwise really enjoyed, which would be an unfortunate thing to have happen.  However, I want to expand on this idea somewhat, because as both a reviewer and, especially, a reader, I find negative reviews to often be just as helpful to me as positive ones.  In this post, I’ll focus on my experience as a reader who actively seeks out negative reviews.  In the next one, I’ll talk about my approach as a reviewer when I need to write them.  Originally this was all going to be one post, but (not-at-all shockingly) I find I have quite a bit to say on this topic!

A stack of books
When I’m choosing my reading material, if I’m not spontaneously buying “whatever looks good” in the bookstore (which, let’s face it, happens fairly often) or something that is a new release, negative reviews are the first place I go.  They’re not all created equal, of course:  some people just have a sentence or two talking about how the book was horrible and not worth the they paid for it, others talk about how the author’s ideas are wrongity wrong because they don’t agree with that reviewer’s political/religious world view (this happens a lot with, of course, political and social science subject matter, but shows up elsewhere too–I’ve seen multiple reviews of romance books with objections that there was “too much sex outside of marriage” in them), and then still others call out specific themes, scenes, or characteristics, and explain why they took issue with them.  The reviews in that last category are the ones I’m looking for, primarily because they help me identify any of my personal deal-breakers, but also because they help to either reinforce or contradict any preconceived notions I might have about the book.

Here’s an example.  I have not read, nor will I ever read, Marley & Me by John Grogan (ever.)  Oh, I wanted to, back in the day:  there was so much buzz about what a heartwarming, feel-good book it was that it was on my “to-read” list for quite some time.  But when I got to the point of actually buying it, I read reviews from (and talked to) people for whom I have a ton of respect because they’ve done a lot of very good and necessary work in the pet rescue community.  Their reviews made me realize that Marley’s owners’ behavior, attitudes, and motivations, as depicted in this book, would probably make me hate it and them as characters.  On balance, the positive reviews I saw weren’t enough to swing the book back over into my “favorable” column.  So I didn’t buy it, and decided not to read it.

Do I think anyone who has read and enjoyed Marley & Me is a bad person, and will I judge them based on that experience?  No.  (Which takes us off-topic, and I could do a whole other post about just this one very intricate and difficult subject, but I feel like I need to put this assertion in here.)

Might I have read this book and enjoyed it?  Possibly.

Do I feel bad about that, like I’m missing out?  No.  There are so many other books that don’t send up red flags for me–more than I could ever read in a lifetime–that I’d prefer to be excited about reading them, than apprehensive about reading Marley & Me just on the off-chance that I might possibly like it.  I’m 99.999% sure I wouldn’t love it, so the trade-off in potential reading time isn’t worth it to me.

And that, really, is the essence of my viewpoint:  negative reviews help me, in my role of “Reader,” filter down the immensely huge number of books on offer, to hopefully identify the ones that I will love.  It doesn’t always work out that way, of course–I’ve written my share of negative reviews here, after all–but I owe a debt of gratitude to other reviewers (especially Veronica and my other cohorts here, for whom I have the utmost respect) who take the time to thoughtfully document their reactions and opinions.  I believe that their efforts help me to get the most enjoyment out of the reading time I have available.

4 comments to On Negative Book Reviews: Part I

  1. tilly says:

    I so agree! I look at the positive AND the negative reviews, and then I make an educated decision. This is where honest reviewers come into play. I need to hear all of the analysis to make a decision. Thanks for your perspective!

  2. Jess says:

    Thanks Tilly! I completely agree that honest reviews (not just for books, but for anything: movies, video games, etc…) are so important. I think we do a good job here of qualifying the negative reviews we do, by both saying “this is WHY my review is negative” and also by saying “if you are the type of reader who like XYZ then you may really enjoy this book. I am not, so I didn’t.” I think we’re all really careful to not only find the good in everything we read, but also to be as helpful as possible.

  3. kreedauthor says:

    I look at the bad reviews to see if they’re only “I hated this book!” or “It’s too much money!” Which aren’t reviews on the book but on things outside the text itself.

    As for Marley & Me…I couldn’t finish it once I realized what the ending would be like. It wasn’t a horrible book in and of itself, but as an animal lover, it wasn’t happening.

  4. Jess says:

    K, exactly! If someone is going to take the time to say “I hated this book!”…take the time to tell us why, ya know? And even worse are the long strings of ratings with no comments at all (I’m looking at you, Barnes & Noble, with your sucky rating system…).

    Amy and I talked about this too, and agreed that there are very, very few books either of us have read that would make us throw up our hands and just say “I hated this book!” But even for those, we’d want to say why (and would likely be snarky and sarcastic about it, because we’re totally going to hell). I’ll touch on some of that in the next post, though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge